(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA084332210; Fri, 26 May 1995 08:30:10 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from tom.compulink.co.uk by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA084162199; Fri, 26 May 1995 08:29:59 -0700
Received: from gonzales.compulink.co.uk (gonzales.compulink.co.uk [192.188.69.4]) by tom.compulink.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id QAA17862 for lightwave@webcom.com; Fri, 26 May 1995 16:33:03 +0100
Date: Fri, 26 May 95 16:33 BST-1
From: garygfx@cix.compulink.co.uk (Gary Fenton)
Subject: CyberStorm 060
To: lightwave@webcom.com
Reply-To: garygfx@cix.compulink.co.uk
Message-Id: <memo.561402@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
I've been using the CyberStorm 060 for over a week on my Amiga 4000 and
it's up to 4.5 times faster than a stock 4000/040 using LightWave. On
average it's 4 times faster.
Textures demo, med res, low AA (32) = 135 secs on 060, 564 secs on 040.
I thought is was going to be faster than a P90 according to some posts to
this mailing list? Oh well.
Gary F.
--
garygfx@cix.compulink.co.uk (Gary Fenton) sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com